Texting While Driving Essay Example for Free

Texting While Driving Essay Texting while driving is one of the most common causes of accidents on roads. This is because texting while driving results in physical, visual and cognitive distraction. It greatly increases the amount of time a driver spends not looking at the road. It is a very serious distraction that can cost you your life or the lives of other people. According to recent research by Queensland’s RACQ, using a mobile phone in general can relay reaction time as much as having a blood alcohol content of 0. 08% which is well over the legal limit of 0.05% in Australia. It reduces your reaction time by 35%, even when using hands-free, so texting is obviously going to be even worse because you are effectively driving blind for however long you look at your phone. In fact, every second you spend texting, you double your chances of being in a crash, so why take the chance? If you are ever driving a car and are about to send a text message or use your phone, think about how important it really is. Is it really worth risking your life to tell someone â€Å"lunch was nice† or â€Å"I’ll be home soon†? Is it worth leaving a child fatherless and asking questions like â€Å"Mum, who will look after me if you go to heaven like dad?† as was the case for 5 year-old Harry Stortz after his Dad Jason was killed by an under-age, unlicensed texting driver? Harry will never get to see his Dad again just so someone could make arrangements to pick a girl up and go to his mate’s house. This is just one horrible example of the vast number of deaths caused by texting while driving. We are all disgusted by drink driving, and for good reason, and using a mobile while driving has been proven in many studies to be just as bad, if not worse. Despite this, around 40% of drivers between 18-24 routinely admit to sending or reading texts while driving. This shows that there is an urgent need for greater fines and punishments for drivers who use their mobiles while driving. Texting while driving is one of the most common causes of accidents on roads. This is because texting while driving results in physical, visual and cognitive distraction. It greatly increases the amount of time a driver  spends not looking at the road. It is a very serious distraction that can cost you your life or the lives of other people. According to recent research by Queensland’s RACQ, using a mobile phone in general can relay reaction time as much as having a blood alcohol content of 0.08% which is well over the legal limit of 0.05% in Australia. It reduces your reaction time by 35%, even when using hands-free, so texting is obviously going to be even worse because you are effectively driving blind for however long you look at your phone. In fact, every second you spend texting, you double your chances of being in a crash, so why take the chance? If you are ever driving a car and are about to send a text message or use your phone, think about how important it really is. Is it really worth risking your life to tell someone â€Å"lunch was nice† or â€Å"I’ll be home soon†? Is it worth leaving a child fatherless and asking questions like â€Å"Mum, who will look after me if you go to heaven like dad?† as was the case for 5 year-old Harry Stortz after his Dad Jason was killed by an under-age, unlicensed texting driver? Harry will never get to see his Dad again just so someone could make arrangements to pick a girl up and go to his mate’s house. This is just one horrible example of the vast number of deaths caused by texting while driving. We are all disgusted by drink driving, and for good reason, and using a mobile while driving has been proven in many studies to be just as bad, if not worse. Despite this, around 40% of drivers between 18-24 routinely admit to sending or reading texts while driving. This shows that there is an urgent need for greater fines and punishments for drivers who use their mobiles while driving. Texting while driving is one of the most common causes of accidents on roads. This is because texting while driving results in physical, visual and cognitive distraction. It greatly increases the amount of time a driver spends not looking at the road. It is a very serious distraction that can cost you your life or the lives of other people. According to recent research by Queensland’s RACQ, using a mobile phone in general can relay reaction time as much as having a blood alcohol content of  0.08% which is well over the legal limit of 0.05% in Australia. It reduces your reaction time by 35%, even when using hands-free, so texting is obviously going to be even worse because you are effectively driving blind for however long you look at your phone. In fact, every second you spend texting, you double your chances of being in a crash, so why take the chance? If you are ever driving a car and are about to send a text message or use your phone, think about how important it really is. Is it really worth risking your life to tell someone â€Å"lunch was nice† or â€Å"I’ll be home soon†? Is it worth leaving a child fatherless and asking questions like â€Å"Mum, who will look after me if you go to heaven like dad?† as was the case for 5 year-old Harry Stortz after his Dad Jason was killed by an under-age, unlicensed texting driver? Harry will never get to see his Dad again just so someone could make arrangements to pick a girl up and go to his mate’s house. This is just one horrible example of the vast number of deaths caused by texting while driving. We are all disgusted by drink driving, and for good reason, and using a mobile while driving has been proven in many studies to be just as bad, if not worse. Despite this, around 40% of drivers between 18-24 routinely admit to sending or reading texts while driving. This shows that there is an urgent need for greater fines and punishments for drivers who use their mobiles while driving. Texting while driving is one of the most common causes of accidents on roads. This is because texting while driving results in physical, visual and cognitive distraction. It greatly increases the amount of time a driver spends not looking at the road. It is a very serious distraction that can cost you your life or the lives of other people. According to recent research by Queensland’s RACQ, using a mobile phone in general can relay reaction time as much as having a blood alcohol content of 0.08% which is well over the legal limit of 0.05% in Australia. It reduces your reaction time by 35%, even when using hands-free, so texting is obviously going to be even worse because you are effectively driving blind for however long you look at your phone. In fact, every second you spend texting, you double your chances of being in a crash, so why take the chance? If you are ever driving a car and are about to send a text message or use your phone, think about how important it really is. Is it really worth risking your life to tell someone â€Å"lunch was nice† or â€Å"I’ll be home soon†? Is it worth leaving a child fatherless and asking questions like â€Å"Mum, who will look after me if you go to heaven like dad?† as was the case for 5 year-old Harry Stortz after his Dad Jason was killed by an under-age, unlicensed texting driver? Harry will never get to see his Dad again just so someone could make arrangements to pick a girl up and go to his mate’s house. This is just one horrible example of the vast number of deaths caused by texting while driving. We are all disgusted by drink driving, and for good reason, and using a mobile while driving has been proven in many studies to be just as bad, if not worse. Despite this, around 40% of drivers between 18-24 routinely admit to sending or reading texts while driving. This shows that there is an urgent need for greater fines and punishments for drivers who use their mobiles while driving. Texting while driving is one of the most common causes of accidents on roads. This is because texting while driving results in physical, visual and cognitive distraction. It greatly increases the amount of time a driver spends not looking at the road. It is a very serious distraction that can cost you your life or the lives of other people. According to recent research by Queensland’s RACQ, using a mobile phone in general can relay reaction time as much as having a blood alcohol content of 0.08% which is well over the legal limit of 0.05% in Australia. It reduces your reaction time by 35%, even when using hands-free, so texting is obviously going to be even worse because you are effectively driving blind for however long you look at your phone. In fact, every second you spend texting, you double your chances of being in a crash, so why take the chance? If you are ever driving a car and are about to send a text message or use your phone, think about how important it really is. Is it really worth risking your life to tell someone â€Å"lunch was nice† or â€Å"I’ll be home soon†? Is it worth leaving a child fatherless and asking questions like â€Å"Mum, who  will look after me if you go to heaven like dad?† as was the case for 5 year-old Harry Stortz after his Dad Jason was killed by an under-age, unlicensed texting driver? Harry will never get to see his Dad again just so someone could make arrangements to pick a girl up and go to his mate’s house. This is just one horrible example of the vast number of deaths caused by texting while driving. We are all disgusted by drink driving, and for good reason, and using a mobile while driving has been proven in many studies to be just as bad, if not worse. Despite this, around 40% of drivers between 18-24 routinely admit to sending or reading texts while driving. This shows that there is an urgent need for greater fines and punishments for drivers who use their mobiles while driving.

The Vietnam War :: Vietnam War Essays

The Vietnam War The Vietnam War is truly one of the most unique wars ever fought by the Unites States of by any country. It was never officially declared a war (Knowll, 3). It had no official beginning nor an official end. It was fought over 10,000 miles away in a virtually unknown country. The enemy and the allies looked exactly the alike, and may by day be a friend but by night become an enemy (Aaseng 113). It matched the tried and true tactics of World War Two against a hide, run, and shoot technique known as "Guerrilla Warfare." It matched some of the best trained soldiers in the world against largely an untrained militia of untrained farmers. The United States' soldiers had at least a meal to look forward to unlike the Communist Vietnamese soldiers who considered a fine cuisine to be cold rice and, if lucky, rat meat. The Vietnam War matched the most technically advanced country with one of the least advanced, and the lesser advanced not only beat but humiliated the strongest military in the wo rld (Aaseng, 111). When the war was finally showing signs of end, the Vietnamese returned to a newly unified communist country while the United Stated soldiers returned to be called "baby killers", and were often spat upon. With the complexities of war already long overdrawn because of the length of the war it is no wonder the returning solders often left home confused and returned home insane. Through an examination of the Vietnam War, in particular an event know as the My Lai Massacre, and the people involved with both, it can be proven that when the threshold for violence of a person is met or exceeded, the resulting psychological scarring becomes the most prominent reason for war being hell. Although officially, the Vietnam Conflict had neither a beginning nor an end, for the purpose of this paper it can be best examined through the decade the United States was involved: February 6, 1965 - August 30, 1975. During World War Two the French had been a major ally to the United States in the defeat of Adolph Hitler and the Axis Powers. France occupied and claimed the small coastline country of Vietnam in Indochina. In this region there had been recent Communist uprisings funded by the USSR The Vietnamese were willing to accept Communism in return for what they had been fighting for over 2000 years: self rule.

Causes of Water Pollution Essay

Nowadays, water pollution is a big problem in Vietnam and many researchers have been studying it. Accordingly, there are two main reasons of water pollution in Vietnam. The weakness in industrial wastewater management is the main cause of water pollution in Vietnam. Many industrial facilities use freshwater to carry away waste from their plants into canals, rivers, and lakes. Most of the enterprises don’t have any wastewater treatment system and many industrial zones don’t have a central wastewater treatment plant. Industrial wastewater is directly discharged into canals, lakes, ponds, and rivers, causing serious pollution of surface water. Besides this, the growing number of factories along the river and their untreated waste disposal is causing a lot of diseases and intestinal sicknesses among people living in the vicinity of the river. The water pollution is clearly visible, and residents can see a tarred black color and smell a pungent odor from the river. Another cause of water pollution in Vietnam is the lack of awareness among citizens. Every day people generate a lot of trash, and they throw it directly into canals, rivers, and ponds. They collect water from these sources to do their laundry, wash dishes, and bathe, and then they throw the dirty water that contained detergent and shampoo directly into them. Moreover, villages in Vietnam involve in paper production, livestock slaughtering, weaving and dyeing also produce a huge volume of wastewater and solid waste, all of which is discharged into the environment in a careless manner. As a result, it causes particularly serious levels of water pollution and poison many forms of aquatic life such as fish, shrimp, crabs, and plant life, slowing their development, and even resulting in their death.

Movie Review Film Minority Report Directed By Steven...

In this paper I will be reviewing the movie Minority Report directed by Steven Spielberg released in 2002. In the entire review of this film, I will be discussing some specific aspects such as few scenes from the movie, some technical aspects and the intended audience of the film. In addition I will add my own opinion to all the aspects throughout this paper. Finally I will round off my review by concluding why this film is worth of watching both for personal entertainment and academic purpose. In this film Tom Cruise plays the role of protagonist as Chief John Anderton. The role of antagonist is played by Max von Sydow as Director Lamar and Colin Farrell as Danny Witwer. Besides, one of the vital roles is played by Samantha Morton as Agatha. This movie takes place during the year of 2054 in Washington, D.C. Tom Cruise as John Anderton is an officer working for an organization called Pre-Crime. In Pre-Crime there are three twins called as Precog who have the ability to visualize murder in the near future. In the Pre-Crime there is a red ball which shows the name of the future murderer when the Precogs predict any murder. The task of John Anderton and his squad is to stop these murders before happening and there has not been a single murder in last six years. The main twist of the plot occurs when the Precog premeditates that John Anderton himself will be a murderer. John Anderton has no clue about the person he is going to murder and he flees away not to get arrested by the Show MoreRelatedProduct Placement10682 Words   |  43 PagesRecent scholarship in film and media studies has drawn attention to the fact that product placement was a common feature of many of the earliest actualities and cinematic attractions that characterised the first ten years of cinema history [7] [8] [edit] Placement in movies Recognizable brand names appeared in movies from cinemas earliest history. Before films were even narrative forms in the sense that they are recognised today, industrial concerns funded the making of what film scholar Tom GunningRead MoreProduct Placement10670 Words   |  43 PagesRecent scholarship in film and media studies has drawn attention to the fact that product placement was a common feature of many of the earliest actualities and cinematic attractions that characterised the first ten years of cinema history [7] [8] [edit] Placement in movies Recognizable brand names appeared in movies from cinemas earliest history. Before films were even narrative forms in the sense that they are recognised today, industrial concerns funded the making of what film scholar Tom Gunning